Everyday food & drink while working
Last checked 24 September 2026 · HMRC source
Food and drink consumed during a normal working day — at a desk, in a café near the office, or at home — is not a deductible business expense. Everyone needs to eat regardless of work, so the cost is at best dual-purpose: it fails the 'wholly and exclusively' test that applies to sole traders, and the stricter 'wholly, exclusively and necessarily' test that applies to employees.
Not the expense you’re looking for?
Search 74 UK business expenses.
Search another expense →Or read the guide: What can I claim as a business expense? →
Conditions
- For sole traders the test is that expenditure must be incurred 'wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the trade' (s34 ITTOIA 2005). Ordinary food and drink fails it because personal sustenance is necessary whether or not you are working. HMRC's general statement of the rule is at BIM37660: 'The cost of food or drink consumed for the human requirement of sustenance is not allowable.' There is no partial deduction — 'The whole cost is disallowed.'
- The principle comes from Caillebotte v Quinn [1975] 50 TC 222, where a sub-contract carpenter was refused the extra cost of buying lunch on site. HMRC quotes Templeman J's reasoning directly: 'A [self-employed] taxpayer, like every other taxpayer, must eat in order to live; he does not eat in order to work.'
- For employees the test is stricter: the amount must be 'incurred wholly, exclusively and necessarily in the performance of the duties of the employment' (s336 ITEPA 2003). HMRC describes the general rule for employees' expenses as 'very restrictive' and the tests as 'stringent and exacting'. Ordinary daily food does not meet them. Employee meal relief, where it exists at all, comes from the separate travel rules in ss337–339 ITEPA 2003, not from s336 — s336(3) expressly excludes amounts deductible under those sections.
- Working from home does not change the position. The rule turns on the purpose of the spending, not its location: food eaten for sustenance is disallowed wherever it is consumed. HMRC's use-of-home guidance (BIM47820) sets out which household costs can be apportioned for trade use — rent, council tax, insurance, repairs, heat and light, metered water, telephone and broadband. Food is not among them.
- The length or productivity of the working day is irrelevant. BIM37660 is explicit: 'It does not matter that work occasions a greater appetite or causes greater expense.' BIM37920 puts the same point the other way round — 'It is immaterial that the physical demands of the taxpayer's occupation require a greater consumption of food or that the location of the work place imposes a greater cost.'
- There are narrow exceptions, and they are about qualifying journeys rather than everyday eating. Under s57A ITTOIA 2005 (BIM47705) a sole trader can deduct reasonable food and drink costs where a deduction is allowable for the cost of travelling to the place, and either the trade is itinerant at the time, or the trader does not travel to that place more than occasionally and the travel is not part of their normal pattern of travel. BIM37670 gives commercial travellers as HMRC's example of an itinerant trade.
- Overnight business trips are a separate exception. Where a trip requires one or more nights away from home, the accommodation and reasonable costs of overnight subsistence are deductible, and 'The reasonable costs of meals taken in conjunction with overnight accommodation are allowable, whether or not paid on the same bill' (BIM37670). This does not extend to accommodation and subsistence at the base of business operations.
- There is no flat-rate meal allowance for the self-employed. HMRC's simplified expenses rules cover exactly three categories — motor vehicles, use of home for business purposes, and private use of business premises (BIM75001). Meals are not one of them, so a sole trader claiming under the exceptions above must claim actual reasonable costs and keep the records to support them.
- The benchmark scale rates people often point to are an employer's rates, not a self-employed allowance. HMRC says who they are for in terms: 'These rates are the maximum tax and NICs free amounts that can be paid by employers who choose to use the system.' Under the Income Tax (Approved Expenses) Regulations 2015 an employer may pay or reimburse an employee £5 for a qualifying journey of at least 5 hours, £10 for at least 10 hours, and £25 for at least 15 hours where the journey is ongoing at 8pm (EIM30240). They apply only where the travel is in the performance of the employee's duties or to a temporary workplace, and the employee has actually incurred a cost on a meal after starting the journey. A sole trader is not an employer paying an employee, so none of this is a rate they can claim for their own meals — under the exceptions above they claim actual reasonable costs.
- A company providing food and drink to its own employees is a different question again: the s317 ITEPA 2003 exemption can cover free or subsidised meals on the employer's premises, and HMRC confirms 'The exemption applies to light refreshments as it does to meals' (EIM21670). That is about how an employer-provided benefit is taxed on the employee — it is not the employee deducting the cost of their own lunch.
Common mistakes
- Claiming coffee or lunch bought near the normal office as a business cost because it was consumed during working hours.
- Thinking that working from home makes grocery shopping or kitchen costs partially claimable — HMRC allows a business proportion of household running costs, but food is not one of the costs it apportions.
- Assuming a self-employed person can claim a daily meal allowance analogous to the employer benchmark scale rates — no such flat rate exists for sole traders.
- Recording daily meals as 'subsistence' in business accounts when no qualifying business journey has taken place.
- Claiming a meal as 'client entertainment' in the belief that this rescues it. It does the opposite: business entertainment — 'the provision of free or subsidised hospitality or entertainment' — is denied a deduction outright by s45 ITTOIA 2005 / s1298 CTA 2009 (BIM45010), whether or not a client was present.
- Treating a regular trip to the same client site as a qualifying journey. The exception requires travel that is not part of your normal pattern, or a trade that is itinerant — a routine commute to a familiar place is neither.
What to keep
- No documentation is needed for everyday food and drink, because no deduction is available for it.
- If you are also claiming subsistence for genuine business journeys, keep records that separate qualifying-journey meals from ordinary daily food — HMRC may ask for evidence that the claimed costs relate to specific journeys.
- For the overnight and long-distance exceptions HMRC stresses that only 'reasonable' expenses may be allowed and that claims 'must be supported by adequate contemporaneous records' — so keep the receipt at the time, not a reconstruction at year end.
Real-world example
A freelance copywriter works from their home office and buys lunch from a local café most weekdays, spending around £8 each time. None of this is deductible — the dual-purpose rule applies regardless of how long or productively they work, and there is no apportionment for the 'extra' cost of eating out. On the day they take a train to a client briefing in another city and buy a sandwich at the station, that meal can be allowable: the travel cost is deductible, and a one-off trip to a city they do not otherwise visit falls outside their normal pattern of travel. The café lunches at home remain personal costs.
Frequently asked
Want someone to check this for you?
The Accountancy Partnership offer fixed-fee online accountancy for sole traders and limited companies — your own dedicated UK accountant, with unlimited help by email, phone or video call, and no long-term contract. They’ve been going over 15 years and work with over 15,000 UK businesses.
Readers here get 10% off their first year — sole trader plans start from around £22/month with the discount applied.
Get an instant quote →Worth saying: if your affairs are very simple, you may not need an accountant at all — this is for when you’d rather someone else handled it.
Affiliate disclosure: we may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. It doesn’t affect what you pay — the 10% discount applies either way. Our guidance is written independently.
Related allowances
Source: HMRC guidance